NON-ERRORS

WHAT SEEMS TO BE AN ERROR IS NOT ALWAYS WRONG...

As I am looking for errors made by others, I have to be the first to admit that I too, can make errors!

It happens indeed from time to time that a visitor writes me and explains that a stamp that I have described as incorrect, is in fact correct.

During years, I removed those stamps from the website. But this had sometimes an unexpected consequence: a message from another visitor presenting me a removed stamp as an error that was missing on the website.

Some time ago, a visitor gave me the idea to create a page dedicated to stamps which seem to be erroneous, but in fact are correct.

Feel free to get in touch if you find a stamp on this website that was incorrectly marked as an error, and explain me why. I will move the stamp to this page, and your explanation could help others avoid making the same mistake I did.

And of course, if you know of an error that is not yet shown on this website, feel free to get in touch — I’ll be happy to add it.




AUSTRIA    1955

Original description of the error
Impossible to recognise the continents on this globe, they only exist in the imagination of the designer.

Comment received from visitor
AUSTRIA 1955 10 years of the UN, globe and flags. You are quite right that it is difficult to see the shapes of continents as they were placed rather differently to what we are accustomed to, but after a while I could see Greenland and North America, so I do not see the real problem here. The real problem is a wrong Soviet flag with a huge hammer and sickle placed centrally in the flag. The real Soviet flag had a small emblem placed in the upper left corner. The flag presented here is definitely wrong.




SAN MARINO    1963

Original description of the error
Take a rest sitting on the lath, maybe convenient, but quite impossible while jumping for competition.

Comment received from visitor
SAN MARINO 1963 (and multiple other in ‘sports’ category) I’m almost sure some ‘impossible for competition’ high jumps (as well as pole jumps) you treat as errors were quite normal in the past. I googled the phrase “high jump female 1960” and many photos seem to confirm it. Strange old pictures on stamps can be real. If you can’t check the pictures for jump errors (I’m not competent to do it) maybe less critical descriptions would be better?




FRENCH ANTARTIC TERRITORIES    1987

Original description of the error
Reindeers do not live in the Southern hemisphere, only in the North.

Comment received from visitor
FRENCH ANTARCTIC TERRITORY 1987 Maybe it is better to change from "error" to "apparent error"? Explanation: what you wrote was true before humans arrived to the Antarctic, but reindeers were successfully introduced in Kerguelen Island in 1956, and several thousand of them still live there wild. I think the stamp is about them. (They were also introduced in South Georgia, but exterminated recently, around 2014).




GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC    1957

Original description of the error
This tour started and ended in Prague. The last stage from Pilsen back to Prague was forgotten.

Comment received from visitor
GDR (DDR) 1957 The International Peace Race. In 1957 this tour started in Prague and ended in Warsaw, please consult: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_Race so no stage is missing on the map. But there is another error here: while Berlin is represented by the Town Hall and Prague by Charles Bridge and they are easy to recognise, Warsaw seems to be represented by the Palace of Culture and Science, which is absolutely not resembling the real palace. Actually I am surprised that in communist Germany they did not know how the real building looked liked, or perhaps there was too little space in the stamp, so they flattened it a bit. Please, compare it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Culture_and_Science. The real palace is very tall, this one looks not tall, but stout and surrounded by strange buildings which in reality do not exist.




NORWAY    1968

Original description of the error
Strange country name on this stamp from Norway: NOREG instead of NORGE.

Comment received from visitor
NOREG is the countryname of Norway in the second language of this country. Can indeed be very confusing for foreigners who are not aware of it !




RUSSIA    1975

Original description of the error
Rusland and France both issued a stamp in 1975 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Russian-French relations., but the Russian stamp put the anniversary wrongly in 1974.

Comment received from visitor
RUSSIA 1975 “Wrong year” “Rusland (??) and France both issued a stamp in 1975 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Russian-French relations., but the Russian stamp put the anniversary wrongly in 1974.” Maybe it is the French stamp with error? Russian Wikipedia is detailed about it and states the relationship was established on 28 October 1924. Yes, maybe the stamp was issued a little bit late, but there is no error ON the stamp. On the other hand, when two stamps give different dates, both are good for your collection.




SAN MARINO    1965

Original description of the error
This Brachiosaurus did not live in water, and his forelegs are too small.

Comment received from visitor
SAN MARINO 1965 “Wrong representation” (dino) Yes, nowadays we think so. But in the 1960’s the idea that such a big animal was too heavy to live on land still prevailed in science (easy to check). Yes, now we think its forelegs were longer. But we cannot blame the designer that he/she was unaware about later development of paleontology. Maybe it would be fair to start the sentence with “Now we know that Brachiosaurus…”?




UNITED STATES OF AMERICA    1966


Original description of the error
At the end of the second World War Poland became a Republic. From then the crown above the eagle was removed from the coat of arms.

Comment received from visitor
USA 1966 crown: There is an error in your description: Poland did not become a republic at the end of the Second World War, but at the end of the First WW in 1918. There is no design error here, only the question of interpretation. The stamp shows the correct arms of Poland until 1945 and from 1989 until today. When the communists occupied Poland in 1944/45 they removed the crown from the head of the Polish White Eagle and that was the only time in history when the Polish Eagle was crownless. So in 1966 this type of eagle was not the official arms of communist Poland but the crownless eagle was rejected by the Polish people and was certainly not accepted by millions of Poles living in the USA. This stamps was issued thanks to Poles living in the USA to celebrate the Millennium of Christianity in Poland, which the communists refuse to celebrate. Communist state in Poland was always very hostile to Christians, so placing a cross and a communist eagle (crownless eagle) would be unthinkable to most Poles and rather offensive. The White Eagle in the stamp represents the Catholic Poland, not the communist one, so it could not be crownless. Such eagle was chosen with purpose and it was not a mistake, as Christian and communist symbols do not go well in a stamps celebrating the Millennium of Christianity in Poland.




NORWAY   

Original description of the error
One stick is missing, and in any case it is much too long to be really helpful /Not an error

Comment received from visitor
The "missing stic" with woman with one long pole is strange for us, but it is not an error. It was exactly so in the past, and two sticks would be an anachronism.